Return |
This Evidence Summary is based on the following systematic review:
Chou R, Hashimoto R, Friedly J, et al. Epidural Corticosteroid Injections for Radiculopathy and Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):373-81. doi: 10.7326/M15-0934. PubMed
In people with radicular low back pain or spinal stenosis, do epidural corticosteroid injections improve pain and function?
Radicular low back pain results from herniated discs or irritation of the nerves that supply the legs. The pain may be felt as lower back pain, sharp shooting pain in the legs, or burning. Symptoms may include numbness and difficulty using the affected limb(s).
Spinal stenosis results from compression in the spinal nerve roots of the lower back due to narrowing of the spinal canal. The pain may be felt as tingling, numbness, or weakness of the buttocks and legs.
Epidural corticosteroid injections are given by a needle inserted through the back into the space around the spinal cord in the affected area.
The researchers did a systematic review based on studies available up to May 2015.
They found 39 randomized controlled trials.
Key features of the trials were:
The quality of evidence varied. Findings that are based on moderate-strength evidence are reported here (low-strength evidence is not reported here).
People with radicular low back pain
Compared with control, epidural corticosteroid injections:
People with spinal stenosis
Epidural corticosteroid injections did not improve function more than control at 2 weeks to 3 months after treatment.
In people with radicular low back pain or spinal stenosis, epidural corticosteroid injections do not improve pain or function.
Effects of epidural corticosteroid injections in people with radicular low back pain or spinal stenosis*
Condition | Outcomes | Assessment periods | Number of trials (people) | Effects of epidural corticosteroid injections compared with control†|
---|---|---|---|---|
Radicular low back pain | Pain | Immediate (5 days to 2 weeks after treatment) | 6 (701) | Small improvement that may not be important to patients: 7-points on a 100-point scale (but could be as few as 4 points or as many as 11 points) |
More than 1 year after treatment | 7 (887) | No difference | ||
Successful pain outcome | More than 1 year after treatment | 4 (504) | No difference | |
Function | 2 weeks to 3 months after treatment | 13 (1529) | No difference | |
Risk of surgery | More than 1 year after treatment | 14 (1208) | No difference | |
Successful composite outcome | 2 weeks to 3 months after treatment | 9 (604) | No difference | |
Spinal stenosis | Function | 2 weeks to 3 months after treatment | 5 (615) | No difference |
*Includes evidence of moderate strength (evidence of low strength is not shown here).
†Controls were placebo, epidural saline, injections without corticosteroids, or no injection.
This Evidence Summary was originally prepared for the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal.
Published: Friday, July 28, 2017
Please note that the information contained herein is not to be interpreted as an alternative to medical advice from a professional healthcare provider. If you have any questions about any medical matter, you should consult your professional healthcare providers, and should never delay seeking medical advice, disregard medical advice or discontinue medication based on information provided here.
This Evidence Summary was printed from the PAIN+ CPN website on 2024/11/21. To view other Evidence Summaries or to register to receive email notifications about new Evidence Summaries, please visit us at https://www.painpluscpn.ca/Articles/EvidenceSummaries |